Note: this post is a part of our important question answer
series on Jurisprudence. You can read other questions by clicking
here.
Pure Theory of Law: Understanding
Hans Kelsen's Legal Philosophy
Hans Kelsen was a prominent legal theorist, Austrian jurist,
and philosopher who introduced the concept of Pure Theory of Law. His theory
argues that the study of Law should be done in its purest sense, without any
influence from other domains like morality, ethics, economics, sociology,
history, or politics. Kelsen's work, "Principles of International
Law" and "Pure Theory of Law," have significantly impacted the
field of jurisprudence.
The only place where you can find
these updates earliest,, join our Telegram
or WhatsApp
group and never miss a single update.
Key Highlights from Kelsen's Theory
1.
Law as Normative Science: Kelsen compared Law
with normative science, meaning that legal analysis should focus on what the
law is, rather than what it ought to be.
2.
Separation of Law and Morality: He strictly
separated Law and Morality, and it is the integral part of his theory. He believed
that Law is a self-contained system that must be studied independently.
3.
Uniform Theory of Law: According to Kelsen, the
theory of law should be uniform, meaning that it should be applied at all times
and in all places.
4.
Grundnorm: Kelsen described Grundnorm as the
highest law of the country, which provides a basis for all other laws. It is
the ultimate norm that is presupposed and never questioned.
Criticism of Kelsen's Theory
1.
Vague Grundnorm: Kelsen designated Grundnorm as
the highest authority of law, but its definition remains vague and confusing.
It is unclear what should be considered as Grundnorm and from where it derives
its powers and authority.
2.
Influence of Social Conditions: Grundnorm cannot
be free from the customs, conventions, or social conditions of that particular
place. For instance, in India, the Constitution can be considered as Grundnorm,
but it is not entirely free from the influence of all these aspects.
3.
Validity of Grundnorm: Kelsen attempted to
change the law into a science that could be understood through logic. However,
he emphasized the validity of the grundnorm to be "assumed" rather
than based on some "logic."
Conclusion
Hans Kelsen's contribution to understanding jurisprudence is
unparalleled. However, his theory of Pure Theory of Law has faced criticism for
its vague definition of Grundnorm and its separation of Law from morality.
Despite its limitations, Kelsen's work has paved the way for further research
in legal theory and influenced the development of various legal systems
worldwide.
Let’s connect with the author on LinkedIn,
(Opens in a new tab)
Also read:
- Question: “A contemporaneous exposition is the best and most powerful in Law.” Briefly describe this principle of Statutory Interpretation.
- Question: Write a detailed note on various theories of punishment.
- Question: write a short note on termination of contract of Agency.
To Support us:
We hope you found this useful. Support us by Sharing
Your Knowledge or any information. Every contribution toward a goal is
valuable, regardless of how small it may be.
·
You can share your internship experience with In
Light of Law Community, click
here.
·
Write article/ blog/notes/case comments/your Law
School news, click here.
Read important descriptive questions
on Constitutional and Contract Law, Click
here.
Read other Paid internship related
posts, Click
here.
0 Comments